Strict grading versus unfair grading: what to look for
Kemon Poray editorial guidance · Last reviewed
A low grade does not by itself show unfair grading, and high marks do not prove good assessment. When students in Bangladesh compare professor feedback, it helps to separate demanding standards from unclear or inconsistent rules. Describe the assessment process before drawing a conclusion about it.
Start with the stated standard
Check what the assignment or exam asked for and how marks were allocated. A strict course can set a high standard while giving students a clear way to meet it. A useful review describes whether expectations were communicated in advance, whether examples were available, and whether the assessment matched the material students were expected to prepare.
Distinguish difficulty from inconsistency
Difficulty concerns the level of work required. Consistency concerns whether the same relevant criteria were applied across work. A question that takes more preparation than expected may be difficult without being unfair. Conversely, easy tasks can still create confusion if instructions change after submission. Focus on what you observed and avoid claiming to know how every classmate was marked.
Assess explanations and review opportunities
Consider whether students received enough information to understand lost marks and whether there was a normal process for asking about mistakes. A score sheet, rubric or worked solution may help even when the result is disappointing. Describe the access you had to explanations. Do not publish someone else's marks, private correspondence or details that identify a student.
Write an observation rather than an accusation
Replace a label such as 'unfair professor' with a specific account of an assessment practice. For example: 'The project criteria were shared before submission, but the returned work did not explain the deductions.' That statement gives readers something to evaluate. Claims about favoritism or intent require more than disappointment with an outcome and can distract from useful teaching feedback.
Use the right channel for a grade dispute
A public review helps future students understand classroom experience; it is not an appeal process. Check your university's current assessment and appeal procedure if you believe a grade contains an error. Follow its instructions and deadlines rather than relying on an anonymous review to resolve the issue. Rate grading separately from unrelated aspects of the course.
Privacy and contributing
Public ratings and reviews do not display your email or account label. Account associations remain privately stored to prevent duplicates and control abuse. Google sign-in and a permanent university and department assignment do not prove enrollment. Only rate professors you have studied with and are eligible to rate through the existing account rules.
Find a professor and share your experience
Open a professor page, choose Rate professor, and follow the sign-in and affiliation steps. Written reviews use the existing rating flow and moderation rules.
Browse all universities